AuditAnalytics: Who Audits Whom PLUS

AuditAnalytics (available in WRDS) is a deep, multifaceted database containing data on thousands of auditors and the corporations they audit. Although the file can easily link auditors and the companies they audit, it has many more uses than a simple “Who Audits Whom” database.

audit analytics 1The image on the left shows the many modules available for searching.

Here are two examples of research questions that show off AuditAnalytics’ ability to analyze auditing in depth.

1. Restatements: Identify companies for which the restatement identified fraud.

The SEC can require a company to reissue its financial statements for reasons ranging from clerical errors to fraud. Here’s how to search AuditAnalytics for an answer.

From the list of modules displayed to the left, choose:

Audit and Compliance => Non-Reliance Restatements.

Now choose your search criteria.

Step 1: Enter Date Range (e.g. from 2004 to date)

Step 2: Choose option “Search Entire Database” (Other options here are to search for one or more companies by ticker or CIK number, or to upload a text file of such company identifiers).

Step 3: Choose Variables to display including “Res Fraud” and “Res Fraud Category Title List”

Click on “Manuals and Overviews” from the top of the screen to identify relevant variables and their definitions for each module.  Here, “Res Fraud” indicates that a restatement identified fraud, and “Res Fraud Category Title List” describes the nature of the fraud.

Step 4: Select an output format, then click “Submit Query”.

Audit2

We’ve displayed the first few entries of the report. A “1” in the “Resfraud” field indicates that a restatement was filed because of fraud. The actual restatement adjustments are frequently issued in an amended 10K report (10K/A). AIG, for example, was accused by the SEC of helping two companies commit accounting fraud.  AIG filed their adjustments in Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, which was filed with the SEC on March 16, 2006.

2. Internal Controls: Identify companies that the SEC has described as having weak internal controls.

One of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 404) requires management to make an annual assement of the effectiveness of their company’s internal control procedures. The SEC then determines the adequacy of the company’s assessments.

In this case, under Audit and Compliance select SOX 404 Internal Controls.

Step 1: Enter Date Range (e.g. 2004 to date)
Step 2: Choose option “Search Entire Database”
Step 3: Choose Variables to display including: “Count Weaknesses” (which is defined as indicating the number of material weaknesses identified).
Step 4: Select an output format

Here are the first few entries of a report sorted by the number of control weaknesses detected. The phrases describing the nature of weaknesses have been truncated. The “Weakness Codes” and “Weakness Phrases” correspond to much more extensive descriptions available in a taxonomy listed in “Manuals and Overviews”.

Audit1

AuditAnalytics is a powerful tool for analyzing the details of corporate auditing and auditors. For more information, take a look at our Accounting Research Guide and our Business FAQ on Accounting and Auditing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s